GeForce MX570 vs Radeon 625

Place in the ranking	797	353
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.88	41.12
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Polaris 24	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	13 May 2019 (5 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2048
Core clock speed	730 MHz	832 MHz
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.58	73.92
Floating-point processing power	0.7864 TFLOPS	4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	40
TMUs	24	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 625 2.81

GeForce MX570 14.90
+430%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon 625 1082

GeForce MX570 5729
+429%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

6−7

−467%

34
+467%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −160%	24−27 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Elden Ring	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −586%	45−50 +586%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −160%	24−27 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −369%	60−65 +369%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −260%	35−40 +260%
Valorant	0−1	55−60

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −586%	45−50 +586%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −160%	24−27 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Dota 2	7−8 −71.4%	12 +71.4%
Elden Ring	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −325%	68 +325%
Fortnite	14−16 −453%	80−85 +453%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −369%	60−65 +369%
Grand Theft Auto V	7−8 −657%	50−55 +657%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −312%	100−110 +312%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −260%	35−40 +260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Valorant	0−1	55−60
World of Tanks	50−55 −278%	190−200 +278%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −586%	45−50 +586%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −160%	24−27 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Dota 2	7−8 −671%	50−55 +671%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −369%	60−65 +369%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −312%	100−110 +312%
Valorant	0−1	55−60

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	0−1	21−24
Elden Ring	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −560%	130−140 +560%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%
World of Tanks	18−20 −447%	100−110 +447%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
Valorant	9−10 −311%	35−40 +311%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Elden Ring	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −450%	40−45 +450%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Dota 2	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Fortnite	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Valorant	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%