GeForce 9300M GS vs MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 and GeForce 9300M GS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX110
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.62
+1348%

MX110 outperforms 9300M GS by a whopping 1348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7191366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.471.35
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM108SG98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2568
Core clock speed978 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,020 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate16.104.400
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPS0.0224 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data34
ROPs84
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4MXM-I
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX110 3.62
+1348%
9300M GS 0.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX110 1425
+1325%
9300M GS 100

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce MX110 9124
+3317%
9300M GS 267

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 10 0−1
Fortnite 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+433%
3−4
−433%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Valorant 50−55
+92.3%
24−27
−92.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Battlefield 5 12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
+275%
12−14
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 36
+300%
9−10
−300%
Far Cry 5 9 0−1
Fortnite 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 13 0−1
Metro Exodus 2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Valorant 50−55
+92.3%
24−27
−92.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 33
+267%
9−10
−267%
Far Cry 5 8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Valorant 50−55
+92.3%
24−27
−92.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Valorant 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how GeForce MX110 and 9300M GS compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX110 is 1700% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX110 is 2500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX110 surpassed 9300M GS in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.62 0.25
Recency 17 November 2017 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 13 Watt

GeForce MX110 has a 1348% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

9300M GS, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX110 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M GS in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2345 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 162 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX110 or GeForce 9300M GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.