GeForce 8200M G vs MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX110 and GeForce 8200M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX110
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
3.18
+2020%

MX110 outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 2020% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7281431
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.41no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)no data
GPU code nameGM108SMCP77MV MCP79MVL
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2568
Core clock speed978 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,020 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.10no data
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce MX110 3.18
+2020%
8200M G 0.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX110 1423
+2089%
8200M G 65

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD180−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Battlefield 5 14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 10 0−1
Fortnite 30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18
+157%
7−8
−157%
Valorant 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Battlefield 5 12 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
+309%
10−12
−309%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 36
+300%
9−10
−300%
Far Cry 5 9 0−1
Fortnite 15 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 13 0−1
Metro Exodus 2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+200%
3−4
−200%
Valorant 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 33
+267%
9−10
−267%
Far Cry 5 8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Valorant 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX110 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX110 surpassed 8200M G in all 28 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.18 0.15
Recency 17 November 2017 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm

GeForce MX110 has a 2020% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce MX110 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2367 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX110 or GeForce 8200M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.