Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG71MAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 October 2006 (18 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642560
Core clock speed16 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors556 Million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data162.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.37 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 17 years, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 157.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.