Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce Go 7600

Place in the ranking	1321	451
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code name	G73	Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2006 (19 years ago)	14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	13	4
Core clock speed	450 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	1950 MHz
Number of transistors	177 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	5 nm
Texture fill rate	3.600	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	350 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	11.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12_2
Shader Model	3.0	no data
OpenGL	2.1	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1567%	50 +1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Valorant	24−27 −250%	90−95 +250%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −700%	16 +700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	12−14 −2977%	400−450 +2977%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Dota 2	10−11 −2900%	300−310 +2900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1200%	39 +1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −525%	24−27 +525%
Valorant	24−27 −250%	90−95 +250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Dota 2	10−11 −2900%	300−310 +2900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −900%	30 +900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2900%	120−130 +2900%
Valorant	24−27 −250%	90−95 +250%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

3−4

−1467%

45−50
+1467%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2200%	21−24 +2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
Valorant	2−3 −2900%	60−65 +2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

−2900%

60−65
+2900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	11 +0%	11 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	13 +0%	13 +0%
Far Cry 5	24 +0%	24 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	15 +0%	15 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Atomic Heart	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Atomic Heart

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Atomic Heart	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Fortnite	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 19 tests (33%)
there's a draw in 39 tests (67%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.28	8.81
Recency	1 March 2006	14 December 2023
Chip lithography	90 nm	5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 3046.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce Go 7600

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce Go 7600

Mobility Radeon HD 4330

Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)

Iris Xe Graphics G7

GeForce Go 7600

Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT

NVIDIA Go 7950 GTX

8700M GT SLI

AMD Ally Extreme GPU

1060 6 GB

NVIDIA GTS 350M

6670

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Radeon Graphics 512SP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 21 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

2.1 10 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7600 or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.