Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce Go 7200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 7200 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms Go 7200 by a whopping 8600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1514 | 499 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Xe LPG (2023−2025) |
| GPU code name | G72 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 September 2006 (19 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 4 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | 1950 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 112 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.800 | no data |
| ROPs | 1 | no data |
| TMUs | 4 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 32 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12_2 |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 25 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1567%
|
50
+1567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−288%
|
90−95
+288%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−8400%
|
850−900
+8400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−8025%
|
650−700
+8025%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1200%
|
39
+1200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−400%
|
24−27
+400%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−288%
|
90−95
+288%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−8025%
|
650−700
+8025%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−900%
|
30
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−7900%
|
400−450
+7900%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−288%
|
90−95
+288%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−8400%
|
170−180
+8400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−2200%
|
21−24
+2200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−42.9%
|
20−22
+42.9%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−8400%
|
85−90
+8400%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−8400%
|
85−90
+8400%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 4900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) performs better in 15 tests (26%)
- there's a draw in 42 tests (74%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 9.57 |
| Recency | 1 September 2006 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 8600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
