Radeon 780M vs GeForce Go 7600 GT

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7600 GT and Radeon 780M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7600 GT
2006
256 MB GDDR3
0.47

780M outperforms Go 7600 GT by a whopping 3238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1240319
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Power efficiencyno data82.80
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameG73Hawx Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2006 (18 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17768
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors177 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7600 GT 0.47
Radeon 780M 15.69
+3238%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7600 GT 210
Radeon 780M 7011
+3239%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
1440p0−122
4K-0−113

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3800%
39
+3800%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−775%
35
+775%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−550%
26
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
Valorant 27−30
−375%
130−140
+375%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1171%
210−220
+1171%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Dota 2 10−12
−827%
100−110
+827%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−400%
20
+400%
Metro Exodus 0−1 29
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−820%
46
+820%
Valorant 27−30
−375%
130−140
+375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%
Dota 2 10−12
−827%
100−110
+827%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1650%
70−75
+1650%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−275%
15
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−480%
29
+480%
Valorant 27−30
−375%
130−140
+375%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−12400%
120−130
+12400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−3140%
160−170
+3140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 16
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 15
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−900%
20
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−40%
21
+40%
Valorant 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 119
+0%
119
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65
+0%
65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Go 7600 GT and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 3500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 780M is 12400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is ahead in 33 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 15.69
Recency 1 August 2006 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm

Radeon 780M has a 3238.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 GT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
GeForce Go 7600 GT
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1808 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7600 GT or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.