Radeon 760M vs GeForce Go 7600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7600 GT with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

Go 7600 GT
2006
256 MB GDDR3
0.47

760M outperforms 7600 by a whopping 2545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1279411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data66.72
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameG73Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 August 2006 (19 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17512
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors177 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.00083.17
Floating-point processing powerno data5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1232
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7600 GT 0.47
Radeon 760M 12.43
+2545%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7600 GT 210
Samples: 8
Radeon 760M 5495
+2517%
Samples: 1517

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
1440p0−118

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−420%
26
+420%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−300%
20
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−513%
45−50
+513%
Valorant 27−30
−322%
110−120
+322%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−988%
180−190
+988%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%
Dota 2 10−12
−691%
85−90
+691%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−200%
15
+200%
Metro Exodus 0−1 27−30
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−513%
45−50
+513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−620%
36
+620%
Valorant 27−30
−322%
110−120
+322%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Dota 2 10−12
−691%
85−90
+691%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−513%
45−50
+513%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−360%
23
+360%
Valorant 27−30
−322%
110−120
+322%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−433%
16
+433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−2340%
120−130
+2340%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 27−30

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−66.7%
24−27
+66.7%
Valorant 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+0%
35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Go 7600 GT and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is 2900% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 760M is 9900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M performs better in 31 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 12.43
Recency 1 August 2006 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm

Radeon 760M has a 2544.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7600 GT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600 GT
GeForce Go 7600 GT
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 379 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7600 GT or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.