UHD Graphics 770 Mobile vs NVS 2100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1364not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.28no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGT218Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16256
Core clock speed535 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.28025.60
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
L2 Cache32 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed790 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 15 Watt

NVS 2100M has 36.4% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 770 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 2100M and UHD Graphics 770 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M
Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile
UHD Graphics 770 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 2100M or UHD Graphics 770 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.