GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs GTX TITAN X

Place in the ranking	163	8
Place by popularity	not in top-100	91
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.84	48.92
Power efficiency	9.25	19.94
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GM200	AD103
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	17 March 2015 (9 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 524% better value for money than GTX TITAN X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	8448
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	1075 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	8,000 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	209.1	689.0
Floating-point processing power	6.691 TFLOPS	44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	192	264
Tensor Cores	no data	264
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	310 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin
SLI options	4x	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.5 GB/s	672.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	5.2	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN X 32.08

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 78.80
+146%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN X 12919

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31736
+146%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90−95 −151%	226 +151%
1440p	60−65 −165%	159 +165%
4K	35−40 −171%	95 +171%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	11.10 −214%	3.54 +214%
1440p	16.65 −231%	5.03 +231%
4K	28.54 −239%	8.41 +239%

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 214% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 231% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 239% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

189

+0%

189

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	189 +0%	189 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	467 +0%	467 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	171 +0%	171 +0%
Dota 2	174 +0%	174 +0%
Far Cry 5	150 +0%	150 +0%
Fortnite	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	442 +0%	442 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	174 +0%	174 +0%
Metro Exodus	79 +0%	79 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	150 +0%	150 +0%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	407 +0%	407 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	155 +0%	155 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	155 +0%	155 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
World of Tanks	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	306 +0%	306 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	159 +0%	159 +0%
Valorant	400−450 +0%	400−450 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	72 +0%	72 +0%
Dota 2	182 +0%	182 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	182 +0%	182 +0%
Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	182 +0%	182 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	22 +0%	22 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	162 +0%	162 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 151% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 165% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 171% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.08	78.80
Recency	17 March 2015	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	285 Watt

GTX TITAN X has 14% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 145.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN X in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.