GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1660 Max-Q GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
33.48
+15.8%

GTX TITAN X outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking169205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.16100.00
Power efficiency9.1824.77
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (9 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 1125% better value for money than GTX TITAN X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721536
Core clock speed1000 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate209.1152.6
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPS4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs19296

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.27.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+11.1%
90
−11.1%
1440p65−70
+8.3%
60
−8.3%
4K40−45
+5.3%
38
−5.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.99
−293%
2.54
+293%
1440p15.37
−303%
3.82
+303%
4K24.98
−314%
6.03
+314%
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 293% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 303% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 314% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 109
+0%
109
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 81
+0%
81
+0%
Battlefield 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+0%
134
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 209
+0%
209
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50
+0%
50
+0%
Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+0%
125
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 207
+0%
207
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Dota 2 116
+0%
116
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+0%
109
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+0%
107
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 30
+0%
30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 197
+0%
197
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 152
+0%
152
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 11% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 8% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN X is 5% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.48 28.91
Recency 17 March 2015 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 15.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
P104-100 P104 100
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB 1050 3 GB
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 1050 Ti Mobile
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
RTX 2080 Max-Q 2080 Max-Q
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 1660 Ti Max-Q
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
RX 590 GME RX 590 GME
GTX TITAN X TITAN X
vs
GTX 1650 TU106 1650 TU106
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
vs
MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 239 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1624 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN X or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.