GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
33.69
+101%

GTX TITAN X outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking160330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.11no data
Power efficiency9.2623.06
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (9 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721024
Core clock speed1000 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate209.176.80
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPS2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs19264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA5.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX TITAN X 33.69
+101%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN X 12950
+101%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6447

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD110−120
+96.4%
56
−96.4%
1440p70−75
+94.4%
36
−94.4%
4K45−50
+87.5%
24
−87.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.08no data
1440p14.27no data
4K22.20no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Valorant 91
+0%
91
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Elden Ring 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 67
+0%
67
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+0%
67
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 42
+0%
42
+0%
World of Tanks 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
World of Tanks 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+0%
21
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 96% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 94% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN X is 88% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.69 16.77
Recency 17 March 2015 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

GTX TITAN X has a 100.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
HD 7350 OEM Radeon HD 7350 OEM
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
HD 7570 Radeon HD 7570
vs
FX 5900 GeForce FX 5900
HD 6570 Radeon HD 6570
vs
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
vs
ATI HD 5450 PCIe x1 Radeon HD 5450 PCIe x1
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
GTX 745 OEM GeForce GTX 745 OEM
vs
RX 570 X2 Radeon RX 570 X2
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GTX 770 GeForce GTX 770
vs
RX 7600S Radeon RX 7600S
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
R9 M275 Radeon R9 M275
GTX TITAN GTX TITAN
vs
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile RTX 3080 Ti Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 235 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 215 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.