Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 980M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M SLI with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M SLI
2014
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 200 Watt
24.58
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.26
+10.9%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GTX 980M SLI by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking222200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.5454.14
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722048
Core clock speed1038 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980M SLI 24.58
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26
+10.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980M SLI 22006
+8.7%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980M SLI 47841
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+38.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980M SLI 18632
+31.8%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p135
−3.7%
140−150
+3.7%
Full HD110
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−10.3%
160−170
+10.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−5.9%
90−95
+5.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−10.3%
160−170
+10.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−5.9%
90−95
+5.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−5.3%
60−65
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−10.3%
160−170
+10.3%
Hitman 3 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−5.3%
120−130
+5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−7.1%
90−95
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−5.6%
150−160
+5.6%
Hitman 3 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−7.1%
150−160
+7.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Hitman 3 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−10.2%
140−150
+10.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how GTX 980M SLI and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 4% faster in 900p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 9% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.58 27.26
Recency 7 October 2014 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 10.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 471.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GeForce GTX 980M SLI
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 53 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 15 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.