Radeon RX 470 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 980

Place in the ranking	198	306
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.04	10.18
Power efficiency	12.07	14.79
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	GM204	Ellesmere
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	19 September 2014 (10 years ago)	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	$549.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 has 8% better value for money than RX 470 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2048
Core clock speed	1064 MHz	926 MHz
Boost clock speed	1216 MHz	1074 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	155.6	137.5
Floating-point processing power	4.981 TFLOPS	4.399 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	128	128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	267 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	-	+
GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.90
+58.4%

RX 470 Mobile 18.24

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 12938
+20.7%

RX 470 Mobile 10715

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	92 +67.3%	55−60 −67.3%
1440p	50 +66.7%	30−35 −66.7%
4K	40 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.97 +67.6%	10.00 −67.6%
1440p	10.98 +67%	18.33 −67%
4K	13.73 +67%	22.92 −67%

GTX 980 has 68% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 980 has 67% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 980 has 67% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +71.9%	30−35 −71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75 +29.3%	55−60 −29.3%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +71.9%	30−35 −71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +72.4%	75−80 −72.4%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 +55.1%	45−50 −55.1%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +48%	50−55 −48%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +41.9%	40−45 −41.9%
Valorant	110−120 +55.4%	70−75 −55.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	77 +32.8%	55−60 −32.8%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +71.9%	30−35 −71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Dota 2	48 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +31.7%	60−65 −31.7%
Fortnite	105 +7.1%	95−100 −7.1%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +72.4%	75−80 −72.4%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 +55.1%	45−50 −55.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	72 +10.8%	65−70 −10.8%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +48%	50−55 −48%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	194 +55.2%	120−130 −55.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +41.9%	40−45 −41.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	67 +17.5%	55−60 −17.5%
Valorant	110−120 +55.4%	70−75 −55.4%
World of Tanks	270−280 +23.2%	220−230 −23.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	67 +15.5%	55−60 −15.5%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +71.9%	30−35 −71.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +66.7%	35−40 −66.7%
Dota 2	95−100 +49.2%	65−70 −49.2%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +31.7%	60−65 −31.7%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +72.4%	75−80 −72.4%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 +55.1%	45−50 −55.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	69 −81.2%	120−130 +81.2%
Valorant	110−120 +55.4%	70−75 −55.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	50−55 +78.6%	27−30 −78.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +75.9%	27−30 −75.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +6.1%	160−170 −6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +68.8%	16−18 −68.8%
World of Tanks	180−190 +50.4%	120−130 −50.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	47 +27%	35−40 −27%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +85.7%	14−16 −85.7%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +83.3%	45−50 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +71.7%	45−50 −71.7%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +62.1%	27−30 −62.1%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +58.5%	40−45 −58.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +80%	24−27 −80%
Valorant	80−85 +76.1%	45−50 −76.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Dota 2	59 +90.3%	30−35 −90.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	59 +90.3%	30−35 −90.3%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +76.9%	12−14 −76.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70 +29.6%	50−55 −29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 +90.3%	30−35 −90.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Dota 2	50−55 +67.7%	30−35 −67.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +69.6%	21−24 −69.6%
Fortnite	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +66.7%	27−30 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
Valorant	40−45 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%

This is how GTX 980 and RX 470 Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 980 is 67% faster in 1080p
GTX 980 is 67% faster in 1440p
GTX 980 is 67% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 980 is 120% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 470 Mobile is 81% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 980 is ahead in 61 test (95%)
RX 470 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	28.90	18.24
Recency	19 September 2014	4 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	85 Watt

GTX 980 has a 58.4% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 470 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 94.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.