Radeon R9 370 vs GeForce GTX 980

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 and Radeon R9 370, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 980
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 165 Watt
28.80
+135%

GTX 980 outperforms R9 370 by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking179374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.781.80
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGM204Trinidad
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 September 2014 (9 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data
Current price$339 (0.6x MSRP)$325

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 has 443% better value for money than R9 370.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1064 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHz975 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate144 billion/sec78.00
Floating-point performance4,981 gflops2,496 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)221 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pins1x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s5600 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s179.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.22x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 28.80
+135%
R9 370 12.23

GeForce GTX 980 outperforms Radeon R9 370 by 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980 11123
+136%
R9 370 4722

GeForce GTX 980 outperforms Radeon R9 370 by 136% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 12938
+146%
R9 370 5249

GeForce GTX 980 outperforms Radeon R9 370 by 146% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+111%
45
−111%
1440p47
+161%
18−20
−161%
4K39
+144%
16−18
−144%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 69
+156%
27−30
−156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Battlefield 5 86
+146%
35−40
−146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Far Cry 5 84
+140%
35−40
−140%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+157%
30−33
−157%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+157%
35−40
−157%
Hitman 3 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+160%
35−40
−160%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+160%
30−33
−160%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+142%
24−27
−142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Battlefield 5 74
+147%
30−33
−147%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Far Cry 5 69
+156%
27−30
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
+137%
27−30
−137%
Forza Horizon 4 230
+142%
95−100
−142%
Hitman 3 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+160%
35−40
−160%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+143%
35−40
−143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+160%
30−33
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+150%
14−16
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+138%
21−24
−138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Far Cry 5 50
+138%
21−24
−138%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+146%
24−27
−146%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+156%
18−20
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+160%
30−33
−160%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+161%
18−20
−161%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
Far Cry 5 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Hitman 3 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+141%
27−30
−141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+144%
9−10
−144%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Hitman 3 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+142%
12−14
−142%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 16
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 34
+143%
14−16
−143%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%

This is how GTX 980 and R9 370 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 is 111% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 is 161% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 is 144% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.80 12.23
Recency 19 September 2014 5 May 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 110 Watt

The GeForce GTX 980 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
AMD Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1314 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 377 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.