ATI Radeon HD 5970 vs GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile with Radeon HD 5970, including specs and performance data.
980 SLI Mobile outperforms HD 5970 by a whopping 568% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 147 | 659 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.32 |
| Power efficiency | 8.54 | 1.44 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | N16E-GXX SLI | Hemlock |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 September 2015 (10 years ago) | 18 November 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 1600 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 1126 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1228 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10400 Million | 2,154 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 330 Watt | 294 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 58.00 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | no data | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | no data | 80 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 305 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 1 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 3500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 128.0 GB/s ×2 |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 137
+661%
| 18−21
−661%
|
| 4K | 68
+580%
| 10−12
−580%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 38.83 |
| 4K | no data | 69.90 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+583%
|
30−33
−583%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+617%
|
12−14
−617%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 95−100
+600%
|
14−16
−600%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+617%
|
18−20
−617%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+583%
|
30−33
−583%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+617%
|
12−14
−617%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+644%
|
16−18
−644%
|
| Fortnite | 160−170
+571%
|
24−27
−571%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+581%
|
21−24
−581%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+631%
|
16−18
−631%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+600%
|
21−24
−600%
|
| Valorant | 210−220
+630%
|
30−33
−630%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+617%
|
18−20
−617%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+583%
|
30−33
−583%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+598%
|
40−45
−598%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+617%
|
12−14
−617%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+581%
|
21−24
−581%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+644%
|
16−18
−644%
|
| Fortnite | 160−170
+571%
|
24−27
−571%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+581%
|
21−24
−581%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+631%
|
16−18
−631%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 120−130
+589%
|
18−20
−589%
|
| Metro Exodus | 85−90
+633%
|
12−14
−633%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+600%
|
21−24
−600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 132
+633%
|
18−20
−633%
|
| Valorant | 210−220
+630%
|
30−33
−630%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+617%
|
18−20
−617%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90
+617%
|
12−14
−617%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+581%
|
21−24
−581%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 110−120
+644%
|
16−18
−644%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+581%
|
21−24
−581%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+600%
|
21−24
−600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 74
+640%
|
10−11
−640%
|
| Valorant | 210−220
+630%
|
30−33
−630%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 160−170
+571%
|
24−27
−571%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+667%
|
12−14
−667%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
+640%
|
35−40
−640%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 75−80
+660%
|
10−11
−660%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+575%
|
8−9
−575%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+629%
|
24−27
−629%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+617%
|
35−40
−617%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100
+586%
|
14−16
−586%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+600%
|
6−7
−600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 85−90
+642%
|
12−14
−642%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+643%
|
14−16
−643%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+590%
|
10−11
−590%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
+593%
|
14−16
−593%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+600%
|
6−7
−600%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
+700%
|
10−11
−700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+725%
|
4−5
−725%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 51
+629%
|
7−8
−629%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+653%
|
30−33
−653%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+638%
|
8−9
−638%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+600%
|
6−7
−600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+575%
|
16−18
−575%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+586%
|
7−8
−586%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+590%
|
10−11
−590%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+600%
|
7−8
−600%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 45−50
+571%
|
7−8
−571%
|
This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and ATI HD 5970 compete in popular games:
- GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 661% faster in 1080p
- GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 580% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 36.59 | 5.48 |
| Recency | 22 September 2015 | 18 November 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 330 Watt | 294 Watt |
GTX 980 SLI Mobile has a 568% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
ATI HD 5970, on the other hand, has 12% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5970 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 5970 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
