GeForce GTX 485M vs 980 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 980 SLI Mobile
2015
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 330 Watt
38.48
+531%

980 SLI Mobile outperforms 485M by a whopping 531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking109550
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation78.893.39
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIN12E-GTX-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 September 2015 (8 years ago)6 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$301 $163

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile has 2227% better value for money than GTX 485M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096384
Core clock speed1126 MHz1150 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHzno data
Number of transistors10400 Million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data36.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data883.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and GeForce GTX 485M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 38.48
+531%
GTX 485M 6.10

980 SLI Mobile outperforms 485M by 531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 33169
+1124%
GTX 485M 2709

980 SLI Mobile outperforms 485M by 1124% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 47704
+252%
GTX 485M 13536

980 SLI Mobile outperforms 485M by 252% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p300−350
+525%
48
−525%
Full HD136
+123%
61
−123%
4K68
+580%
10−12
−580%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+570%
10−11
−570%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+857%
7−8
−857%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+629%
16−18
−629%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+554%
12−14
−554%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+570%
10−11
−570%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+316%
18−20
−316%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+506%
16−18
−506%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+427%
21−24
−427%
Hitman 3 95−100
+586%
14−16
−586%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+526%
21−24
−526%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+560%
14−16
−560%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+447%
16−18
−447%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+595%
18−20
−595%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+689%
9−10
−689%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+857%
7−8
−857%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+629%
16−18
−629%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+554%
12−14
−554%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+570%
10−11
−570%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+316%
18−20
−316%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+506%
16−18
−506%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+427%
21−24
−427%
Hitman 3 95−100
+586%
14−16
−586%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+526%
21−24
−526%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+560%
14−16
−560%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+447%
16−18
−447%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+595%
18−20
−595%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+915%
12−14
−915%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+689%
9−10
−689%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+857%
7−8
−857%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+554%
12−14
−554%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+570%
10−11
−570%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+316%
18−20
−316%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+427%
21−24
−427%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+526%
21−24
−526%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+560%
14−16
−560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+469%
12−14
−469%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+689%
9−10
−689%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+447%
16−18
−447%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+517%
12−14
−517%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+900%
9−10
−900%
Hitman 3 50−55
+750%
6−7
−750%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+625%
8−9
−625%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+678%
9−10
−678%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+627%
10−12
−627%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+546%
12−14
−546%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+4550%
2−3
−4550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+1033%
3−4
−1033%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 60−65
+281%
16−18
−281%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+1125%
4−5
−1125%
Hitman 3 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+717%
6−7
−717%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+783%
6−7
−783%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+717%
6−7
−717%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and GTX 485M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 525% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 123% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 580% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 4550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 980 SLI Mobile surpassed GTX 485M in all 71 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.48 6.10
Recency 22 September 2015 6 January 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 100 Watt

The GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 485M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 65 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.