Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce GTX 965M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 965M
2015
4 GB GDDR5
9.75

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 611% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking42318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.9218.71
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN16E-GS, N16E-GRNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)8 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current price$1546 $957 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6900 XT has 1934% better value for money than GTX 965M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10245120
CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed944 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed950 / 1151 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown300 Watt
Texture fill rate73.60720.0
Floating-point performance2,355 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon RX 6900 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
Vulkan1.11.2
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.75
RX 6900 XT 69.33
+611%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 611% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 965M 3775
RX 6900 XT 26853
+611%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 611% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M 7322
RX 6900 XT 59119
+707%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 707% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M 5536
RX 6900 XT 50587
+814%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 965M by 814% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−320%
193
+320%
1440p25
−436%
134
+436%
4K21
−295%
83
+295%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−807%
130−140
+807%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
−277%
117
+277%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−1027%
169
+1027%
Battlefield 5 52
−275%
195
+275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−565%
170−180
+565%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−807%
130−140
+807%
Far Cry 5 38
−313%
150−160
+313%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−232%
126
+232%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−502%
283
+502%
Hitman 3 24−27
−1032%
283
+1032%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−925%
205
+925%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−1053%
196
+1053%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−616%
222
+616%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−1018%
190
+1018%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
−342%
106
+342%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−847%
142
+847%
Battlefield 5 43
−356%
196
+356%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−565%
170−180
+565%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−807%
130−140
+807%
Far Cry 5 35
−349%
150−160
+349%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
−251%
123
+251%
Forza Horizon 4 41
−580%
279
+580%
Hitman 3 24−27
−1004%
276
+1004%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−770%
174
+770%
Metro Exodus 15
−993%
164
+993%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−629%
124
+629%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−1492%
207
+1492%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−942%
323
+942%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−900%
170
+900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
−654%
98
+654%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−813%
137
+813%
Battlefield 5 35
−463%
197
+463%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−807%
130−140
+807%
Far Cry 5 32
−391%
150−160
+391%
Far Cry New Dawn 32
−269%
118
+269%
Forza Horizon 4 28
−786%
248
+786%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−811%
164
+811%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−612%
121
+612%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−800%
120−130
+800%
Hitman 3 14−16
−1320%
213
+1320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−807%
136
+807%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1175%
102
+1175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1071%
82
+1071%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1123%
159
+1123%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
−890%
99
+890%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−2080%
109
+2080%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−1125%
196
+1125%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1380%
70−75
+1380%
Far Cry 5 22
−509%
130−140
+509%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−631%
117
+631%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−1183%
231
+1183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1322%
120−130
+1322%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−2175%
91
+2175%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1322%
128
+1322%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−375%
38
+375%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1000%
55
+1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−1600%
85
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−838%
122
+838%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3
−2167%
68
+2167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1550%
66
+1550%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1575%
134
+1575%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Far Cry 5 10
−720%
80−85
+720%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
−226%
101
+226%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−1057%
162
+1057%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−1700%
54
+1700%

This is how GTX 965M and RX 6900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6900 XT is 320% faster than GTX 965M in 1080p
  • RX 6900 XT is 436% faster than GTX 965M in 1440p
  • RX 6900 XT is 295% faster than GTX 965M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 3400% faster than the GTX 965M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6900 XT surpassed GTX 965M in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.75 69.33
Recency 5 January 2015 8 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 104 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3379 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.