Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs GTX 965M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 965M
2016
2 GB GDDR5
9.91

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile outperforms GTX 965M by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking459401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.67no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM206Sno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2016 (9 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed944 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate73.60no data
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+no data
Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.91
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.45
+25.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 965M 5536
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401
+15.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
1440p26
−15.4%
30−35
+15.4%
4K22
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 36
−25%
45−50
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Metro Exodus 38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Valorant 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40
−25%
50−55
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Dota 2 28
−25%
35−40
+25%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Fortnite 59
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 23
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
−22%
50−55
+22%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Valorant 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
World of Tanks 140−150
−18.9%
170−180
+18.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 19
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Dota 2 77
−23.4%
95−100
+23.4%
Far Cry 5 49
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−25%
50−55
+25%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Valorant 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
World of Tanks 70−75
−19.7%
85−90
+19.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Valorant 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 44
−25%
55−60
+25%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Fortnite 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

This is how GTX 965M and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 22% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 15% faster in 1440p
  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 23% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.91 12.45
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

GTX 965M has a 68166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 25.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 111 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 124 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.