RTX A500 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 960M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 960M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.78

RTX A500 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by an impressive 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking459322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.47no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN16P-GXGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 March 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402048
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1096 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1202 MHz1537 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate47.0498.37
Floating-point performance1,505 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 960M and RTX A500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960M 8.78
RTX A500 Mobile 15.46
+76.1%

RTX A500 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 960M 5278
RTX A500 Mobile 10748
+104%

RTX A500 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 104% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95
−68.4%
160−170
+68.4%
Full HD36
−55.6%
56
+55.6%
1440p15
−66.7%
25
+66.7%
4K14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
−28%
30−35
+28%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Battlefield 5 30
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−78.9%
30−35
+78.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 28
−50%
40−45
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
−38.7%
40−45
+38.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−48.6%
50−55
+48.6%
Hitman 3 20−22
−80%
35−40
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 31
−51.6%
45−50
+51.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−72%
40−45
+72%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−208%
77
+208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−68.4%
30−35
+68.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Battlefield 5 23
−117%
50−55
+117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−78.9%
30−35
+78.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−185%
74
+185%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
−79.2%
40−45
+79.2%
Forza Horizon 4 31
−67.7%
50−55
+67.7%
Hitman 3 20−22
−80%
35−40
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 25
−88%
45−50
+88%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−72%
40−45
+72%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−244%
31
+244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−33.3%
30−35
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
−191%
30−35
+191%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−78.9%
30−35
+78.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 18
−133%
40−45
+133%
Forza Horizon 4 25
−108%
50−55
+108%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 23
−104%
45−50
+104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−129%
30−35
+129%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−72%
40−45
+72%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14
−114%
30−33
+114%
Far Cry New Dawn 16
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
Hitman 3 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−100%
16−18
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Far Cry 5 15
−66.7%
24−27
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Metro Exodus 15
−80%
27−30
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−290%
39
+290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 8
−100%
16−18
+100%
Hitman 3 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−50%
14−16
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Battlefield 5 3
−433%
16−18
+433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Metro Exodus 6
−150%
14−16
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

This is how GTX 960M and RTX A500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A500 Mobile is 68% faster in 900p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 56% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 67% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 71% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A500 Mobile is 433% faster than the GTX 960M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A500 Mobile surpassed GTX 960M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.78 15.46
Recency 12 March 2015 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

The RTX A500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 925 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.