RTX A4000 vs GeForce GTX 960M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 960M with RTX A4000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 960M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
8.79

RTX A4000 outperforms GTX 960M by a whopping 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking46054
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4913.21
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN16P-GXGA104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2015 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$799 $1112

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A4000 has 787% better value for money than GTX 960M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6406144
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1096 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1202 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate47.04299.5
Floating-point performance1,505 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 960M and RTX A4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960M 8.79
RTX A4000 50.24
+472%

RTX A4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 960M 3395
RTX A4000 19401
+471%

RTX A4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 471% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 960M 10755
RTX A4000 122172
+1036%

RTX A4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 1036% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 960M 8878
RTX A4000 108865
+1126%

RTX A4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 1126% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 960M 11818
RTX A4000 124547
+954%

RTX A4000 outperforms GeForce GTX 960M by 954% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95
−426%
500−550
+426%
Full HD36
−456%
200−210
+456%
1440p14
−471%
80−85
+471%
4K14
−471%
80−85
+471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
−460%
140−150
+460%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Battlefield 5 30
−467%
170−180
+467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Far Cry 5 28
−471%
160−170
+471%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
−448%
170−180
+448%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−471%
200−210
+471%
Hitman 3 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−453%
210−220
+453%
Metro Exodus 31
−448%
170−180
+448%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−445%
180−190
+445%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−426%
100−105
+426%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Battlefield 5 23
−465%
130−140
+465%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Far Cry 5 24
−442%
130−140
+442%
Far Cry New Dawn 23
−465%
130−140
+465%
Forza Horizon 4 71
−463%
400−450
+463%
Hitman 3 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−453%
210−220
+453%
Metro Exodus 25
−460%
140−150
+460%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−442%
130−140
+442%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−445%
180−190
+445%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
−445%
60−65
+445%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Far Cry 5 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 25
−460%
140−150
+460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−453%
210−220
+453%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−471%
80−85
+471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−445%
180−190
+445%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−460%
140−150
+460%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14
−471%
80−85
+471%
Far Cry New Dawn 16
−463%
90−95
+463%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−463%
45−50
+463%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Far Cry 5 15
−467%
85−90
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 18
−456%
100−105
+456%
Hitman 3 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Metro Exodus 15
−467%
85−90
+467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 7
−471%
40−45
+471%
Hitman 3 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−450%
55−60
+450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 4
−425%
21−24
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Metro Exodus 6
−400%
30−33
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

This is how GTX 960M and RTX A4000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 426% faster in 900p
  • RTX A4000 is 456% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4000 is 471% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4000 is 471% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.79 50.24
Recency 12 March 2015 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 140 Watt

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960M is a notebook card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 927 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 577 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.