GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GTX 960M

Place in the ranking	495	36
Place by popularity	not in top-100	16
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	83.12
Power efficiency	8.05	25.52
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GM107	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	4352
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	1176 MHz	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	47.04	344.8
Floating-point processing power	1.505 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	40	136
Tensor Cores	no data	136
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960M 8.77

RTX 4060 Ti 59.31
+576%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 960M 3370

RTX 4060 Ti 22795
+576%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	95 −532%	600−650 +532%
Full HD	35 −557%	230−240 +557%
1440p	15 −567%	100−110 +567%
4K	14 −543%	90−95 +543%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.73
1440p	no data	3.99
4K	no data	4.43

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −547%	110−120 +547%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −567%	120−130 +567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	23 −552%	150−160 +552%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −547%	110−120 +547%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −567%	120−130 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −557%	230−240 +557%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −567%	140−150 +567%
Metro Exodus	27 −567%	180−190 +567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −567%	160−170 +567%
Valorant	30−35 −567%	220−230 +567%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	25 −540%	160−170 +540%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −547%	110−120 +547%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −567%	120−130 +567%
Dota 2	21 −567%	140−150 +567%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −576%	250−260 +576%
Fortnite	36 −567%	240−250 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −557%	230−240 +557%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −567%	140−150 +567%
Grand Theft Auto V	31 −545%	200−210 +545%
Metro Exodus	17 −547%	110−120 +547%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	99 −557%	650−700 +557%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −567%	160−170 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −543%	180−190 +543%
Valorant	30−35 −567%	220−230 +567%
World of Tanks	130−140 −554%	850−900 +554%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20 −550%	130−140 +550%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −547%	110−120 +547%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −567%	120−130 +567%
Dota 2	30−35 −545%	200−210 +545%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −576%	250−260 +576%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −557%	230−240 +557%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −567%	140−150 +567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20 −550%	130−140 +550%
Valorant	30−35 −567%	220−230 +567%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −574%	290−300 +574%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
World of Tanks	60−65 −535%	400−450 +535%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14 −543%	90−95 +543%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −532%	120−130 +532%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −532%	120−130 +532%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −554%	85−90 +554%
Metro Exodus	15 −567%	100−105 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −567%	80−85 +567%
Valorant	21−24 −536%	140−150 +536%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −554%	85−90 +554%
Dota 2	20 −550%	130−140 +550%
Grand Theft Auto V	20 −550%	130−140 +550%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24 −567%	160−170 +567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −550%	130−140 +550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6 −567%	40−45 +567%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −554%	85−90 +554%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Dota 2	18−20 −532%	120−130 +532%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Fortnite	9−10 −567%	60−65 +567%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Valorant	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%

This is how GTX 960M and RTX 4060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti is 532% faster in 900p
RTX 4060 Ti is 557% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti is 567% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti is 543% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.77	59.31
Recency	13 March 2015	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	160 Watt

GTX 960M has 113.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 576.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.