GeForce RTX 4060 vs GTX 960M

Place in the ranking	492	53
Place by popularity	not in top-100	2
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	100.00
Power efficiency	8.04	30.83
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GM107	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	13 March 2015 (9 years ago)	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	3072
Core clock speed	1096 MHz	1830 MHz
Boost clock speed	1176 MHz	2460 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	47.04	236.2
Floating-point processing power	1.505 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	40	96
Tensor Cores	no data	96
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	240 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	2125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	272.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960M 8.77

RTX 4060 51.51
+487%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 960M 3372

RTX 4060 19807
+487%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 960M 5278

RTX 4060 38191
+624%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 960M 4318

RTX 4060 28111
+551%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 960M 30086

RTX 4060 156140
+419%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 960M 226308

RTX 4060 769721
+240%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	95 −479%	550−600 +479%
Full HD	35 −289%	136 +289%
1440p	15 −360%	69 +360%
4K	14 −186%	40 +186%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.20
1440p	no data	4.33
4K	no data	7.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −694%	135 +694%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −718%	139 +718%
Elden Ring	24−27 −492%	148 +492%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	23 −404%	110−120 +404%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −541%	109 +541%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −218%	54 +218%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −677%	272 +677%
Metro Exodus	27 −511%	165 +511%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −300%	95−100 +300%
Valorant	30−35 −600%	210−220 +600%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	25 −364%	110−120 +364%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −435%	91 +435%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −165%	45 +165%
Dota 2	21 −638%	155 +638%
Elden Ring	24−27 −656%	180−190 +656%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −303%	149 +303%
Fortnite	36 −478%	200−210 +478%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −520%	217 +520%
Grand Theft Auto V	31 −410%	158 +410%
Metro Exodus	17 −594%	118 +594%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	99 −117%	210−220 +117%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −300%	95−100 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −521%	170−180 +521%
Valorant	30−35 −600%	210−220 +600%
World of Tanks	130−140 −115%	270−280 +115%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20 −480%	110−120 +480%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −347%	76 +347%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −135%	40 +135%
Dota 2	30−35 −481%	180−190 +481%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −197%	110−120 +197%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −443%	190 +443%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20 −975%	210−220 +975%
Valorant	30−35 −600%	210−220 +600%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−11 −800%	90 +800%
Elden Ring	12−14 −875%	110−120 +875%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 −718%	90 +718%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −307%	170−180 +307%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −700%	55−60 +700%
World of Tanks	60−65 −424%	300−350 +424%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14 −500%	80−85 +500%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −360%	46 +360%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −300%	24 +300%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −737%	150−160 +737%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −617%	129 +617%
Metro Exodus	15 −640%	111 +640%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −910%	100−110 +910%
Valorant	21−24 −741%	180−190 +741%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −1833%	55−60 +1833%
Dota 2	20 −345%	89 +345%
Elden Ring	5−6 −1060%	55−60 +1060%
Grand Theft Auto V	20 −345%	89 +345%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −850%	38 +850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24 −638%	170−180 +638%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −500%	35−40 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −345%	89 +345%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6 −967%	60−65 +967%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −1833%	55−60 +1833%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10 +400%
Dota 2	18−20 −479%	110−120 +479%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −770%	85−90 +770%
Fortnite	9−10 −822%	80−85 +822%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −600%	70 +600%
Valorant	9−10 −1033%	100−110 +1033%

This is how GTX 960M and RTX 4060 compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 is 479% faster in 900p
RTX 4060 is 289% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 is 360% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 is 186% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 is 1833% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 4060 surpassed GTX 960M in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.77	51.51
Recency	13 March 2015	18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt

GTX 960M has 53.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060, on the other hand, has a 487.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.