ATI Radeon 9250 vs GeForce GTX 960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3521541
Place by popularity49not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.91no data
Power efficiency9.05no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGM206RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 January 2015 (10 years ago)1 March 2004 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1127 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate75.390.96
Floating-point processing power2.413 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)400 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s200 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 960 6101
+304950%
ATI 9250 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65no data
4K29no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
4K6.86no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Fortnite 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Dota 2 90−95 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Fortnite 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 5 45−50 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 49 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Dota 2 90−95 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 January 2015 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GTX 960 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 960 and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
ATI Radeon 9250
Radeon 9250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3936 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 54 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 960 or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.