Quadro P4200 vs GeForce GTX 960

Aggregate performance score

GTX 960
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
15.72

Quadro P4200 outperforms GeForce GTX 960 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking318196
Place by popularity53not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.217.80
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM206GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 January 2015 (9 years ago)7 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$440 (2.2x MSRP)$1526

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4200 has 253% better value for money than GTX 960.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242304
CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1127 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate72 billion/sec237.2
Floating-point performance2,413 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 960 and Quadro P4200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)400 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinsNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s7132 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 960 15.72
Quadro P4200 25.11
+59.7%

Quadro P4200 outperforms GeForce GTX 960 by 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 960 6072
Quadro P4200 10685
+76%

Quadro P4200 outperforms GeForce GTX 960 by 76% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 960 18235
Quadro P4200 34868
+91.2%

Quadro P4200 outperforms GeForce GTX 960 by 91% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 960 17784
Quadro P4200 37676
+112%

Quadro P4200 outperforms GeForce GTX 960 by 112% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65
−53.8%
100−110
+53.8%
4K30
−50%
45−50
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 no data
Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Hitman 3 30−33 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 no data
Battlefield 5 50−55 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Hitman 3 30−33 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−33 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 no data
Hitman 3 10−12 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

This is how GTX 960 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 54% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.72 25.11
Recency 22 January 2015 7 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 115 Watt

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 960 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 960 is a desktop card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3446 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 55 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.