Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 950

Place in the ranking	376	467
Place by popularity	not in top-100	87
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.75	no data
Power efficiency	10.54	23.17
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GM206	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	20 August 2015 (9 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	96
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1188 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	57.02	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.825 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	202 mm	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	6.6 GB/s	no data
Memory bandwidth	105.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	no data
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 950 13.85
+46.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.47

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 950 8351
+28.4%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 950 6208
+20.8%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 950 37454
+38.8%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 +92.3%	26 −92.3%
1440p	21−24 +40%	15 −40%
4K	21 +90.9%	11 −90.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.18	no data
1440p	7.57	no data
4K	7.57	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24
+5%

−5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +45.5%	22 −45.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +4.8%	21 −4.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −28.6%	36 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +31.3%	16 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +45.5%	21−24 −45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +46.2%	24−27 −46.2%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +42.9%	60−65 −42.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 +8.3%	24 −8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −74.6%	124 +74.6%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +31.4%	35 −31.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +124%	17 −124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +45.2%	30−35 −45.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −20%	90 +20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +39.1%	21−24 −39.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +22.2%	18 −22.2%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −14.3%	32 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +61.5%	13 −61.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +45.5%	21−24 −45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +46.2%	24−27 −46.2%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +42.9%	60−65 −42.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 +13%	23 −13%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −57.7%	112 +57.7%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +64.3%	28 −64.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +46.2%	26 −46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +50%	30 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	108 +315%	24−27 −315%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −12%	84 +12%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +129%	14 −129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +21.7%	23 −21.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +90.9%	11 −90.9%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +45.5%	21−24 −45.5%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +42.9%	60−65 −42.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 +30%	20 −30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +209%	23 −209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +87.5%	24 −87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 +50%	14 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +23%	60−65 −23%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+171%

−171%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +70.7%	40−45 −70.7%
Hitman 3	16−18 +30.8%	12−14 −30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +40%	20−22 −40%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +84.6%	12−14 −84.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +26.3%	19 −26.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +43.3%	60−65 −43.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+43.8%

16−18

−43.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Hitman 3	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +74.4%	35−40 −74.4%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 +8.3%	12 −8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +18.2%	11 −18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+44.4%

9−10

−44.4%

This is how GTX 950 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

GTX 950 is 92% faster in 1080p
GTX 950 is 40% faster in 1440p
GTX 950 is 91% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 950 is 315% faster.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 75% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 950 is ahead in 65 tests (90%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 6 tests (8%)
there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.85	9.47
Recency	20 August 2015	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	28 Watt

GTX 950 has a 46.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 221.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 950 is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.