ATI Radeon IGP 350M vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 780 6 GB GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti 6 GB GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN Z
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon IGP 320M Radeon IGP 330M Radeon IGP 340M Radeon IGP 345M Radeon IGP 350M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with Radeon IGP 350M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
10.77
+53750%

GTX 780 Rev. 2 outperforms ATI IGP 350M by a whopping 53750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
ATI IGP 350M IGP 350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4291495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.30no data
Power efficiency2.95no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK110BRS200
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2013 (11 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed863 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate173.20.37
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs1922

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.77 0.02
Recency 10 September 2013 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 53750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Radeon IGP 350M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
ATI Radeon IGP 350M
Radeon IGP 350M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
ATI IGP 350M Radeon IGP 350M
vs
GeForce 7000M GeForce 7000M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9600 XT Radeon 9600 XT
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9800 PRO Radeon 9800 PRO
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9500 Radeon 9500
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9800 SE Radeon 9800 SE
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI E2400 Radeon E2400
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI IGP 320 Radeon IGP 320
RX 5300 Radeon RX 5300
vs
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
ATI HD 3450 Radeon HD 3450
vs
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
RX 560 Radeon RX 560
vs
GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 9 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.