Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce GTX 775M

Place in the ranking	468	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	37.53
Power efficiency	6.55	17.33
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	N13E-GTX-A2	Navi 31
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	24 September 2013 (11 years ago)	3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	5376
Core clock speed	719 MHz	1387 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2394 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	804.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	192
TMUs	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	276 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	800.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.2
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.42

RX 7900 XT 74.78
+694%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634

RX 7900 XT 28851
+694%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071

RX 7900 XT 75896
+1150%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 775M 11869

RX 7900 XT 186399
+1470%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −763%	207 +763%
1440p	16−18 −756%	137 +756%
4K	10−12 −790%	89 +790%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.34
1440p	no data	6.56
4K	no data	10.10

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−1480%

237
+1480%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −565%	150−160 +565%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −864%	130−140 +864%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −728%	240−250 +728%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −532%	120−130 +532%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −1313%	212 +1313%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −436%	110−120 +436%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −612%	180−190 +612%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −287%	240−250 +287%
Hitman 3	18−20 −617%	120−130 +617%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −415%	260−270 +415%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −434%	150−160 +434%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −373%	120−130 +373%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −932%	300−350 +932%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −151%	150−160 +151%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −565%	150−160 +565%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −864%	130−140 +864%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −728%	240−250 +728%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −532%	120−130 +532%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −1167%	190 +1167%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −436%	110−120 +436%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −612%	180−190 +612%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −287%	240−250 +287%
Hitman 3	18−20 −617%	120−130 +617%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −415%	260−270 +415%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −434%	150−160 +434%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −373%	120−130 +373%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −1487%	492 +1487%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −523%	160−170 +523%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −151%	150−160 +151%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −565%	150−160 +565%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −864%	130−140 +864%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −532%	120−130 +532%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −1093%	179 +1093%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −436%	110−120 +436%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −287%	240−250 +287%
Hitman 3	18−20 −617%	120−130 +617%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −573%	350 +573%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −1268%	424 +1268%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −919%	265 +919%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −151%	150−160 +151%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−373%

120−130
+373%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −822%	160−170 +822%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −700%	110−120 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −889%	85−90 +889%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1840%	95−100 +1840%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −811%	80−85 +811%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2950%	122 +2950%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −664%	80−85 +664%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −561%	270−280 +561%
Hitman 3	12−14 −738%	100−110 +738%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −1285%	277 +1285%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −985%	141 +985%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −2855%	325 +2855%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1433%	130−140 +1433%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −300%	240−250 +300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−650%

120−130
+650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −878%	85−90 +878%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −886%	65−70 +886%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1240%	65−70 +1240%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −479%	220−230 +479%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −1643%	120−130 +1643%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −2171%	159 +2171%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1160%	60−65 +1160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1425%	60−65 +1425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1200%	50−55 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −5900%	60 +5900%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1033%	130−140 +1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2783%	173 +2783%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

−833%

80−85
+833%

This is how GTX 775M and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is 763% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XT is 756% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XT is 790% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 5900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7900 XT surpassed GTX 775M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.42	74.78
Recency	24 September 2013	3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	300 Watt

GTX 775M has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has a 693.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.