ATI Radeon HD 4650 vs FirePro M6100
Aggregate performance score
We've compared FirePro M6100 with Radeon HD 4650, including specs and performance data.
M6100 outperforms ATI HD 4650 by a whopping 864% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 624 | 1238 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.92 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | Emerald | RV730 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 May 2014 (11 years ago) | 10 September 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,080 million | 514 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 48 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | 19.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.971 TFLOPS | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 8 |
| TMUs | 56 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 193 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 22.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (6.0) | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.170 | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 52
+940%
| 5−6
−940%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+1250%
|
2−3
−1250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+1250%
|
2−3
−1250%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+1067%
|
3−4
−1067%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+1200%
|
2−3
−1200%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18
+1500%
|
1−2
−1500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+1017%
|
6−7
−1017%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+1250%
|
2−3
−1250%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 95−100
+967%
|
9−10
−967%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+1075%
|
4−5
−1075%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+1067%
|
3−4
−1067%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+1200%
|
2−3
−1200%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18
+1500%
|
1−2
−1500%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+1500%
|
1−2
−1500%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+1017%
|
6−7
−1017%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+1075%
|
4−5
−1075%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+1200%
|
2−3
−1200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+1500%
|
1−2
−1500%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+1017%
|
6−7
−1017%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 35−40
+1067%
|
3−4
−1067%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
+1000%
|
4−5
−1000%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+1100%
|
3−4
−1100%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+983%
|
6−7
−983%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Dead Island 2 | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dead Island 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 27−30
+867%
|
3−4
−867%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Dead Island 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 20−22
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 6−7 | 0−1 |
This is how FirePro M6100 and ATI HD 4650 compete in popular games:
- FirePro M6100 is 940% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.88 | 0.61 |
| Recency | 27 May 2014 | 10 September 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
FirePro M6100 has a 863.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.
The FirePro M6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4650 in performance tests.
Be aware that FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 4650 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
