Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs GeForce GTX 775M

Place in performance ranking	442	647
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.71	0.91
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code name	N13E-GTX-A2	Kaby Lake GT3e
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 September 2013 (10 years ago)	1 September 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price	$780	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 775M has 88% better value for money than Iris Plus Graphics 655.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	48
Core clock speed	719 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	50.40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 775M and Iris Plus Graphics 655 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x1
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	System Shared
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	no data	1.1.103
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.30
+121%

Iris Plus Graphics 655 4.21

GeForce GTX 775M outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 by 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 775M 3593
+107%

Iris Plus Graphics 655 1739

GeForce GTX 775M outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 by 107% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 775M 6071
+110%

Iris Plus Graphics 655 2894

GeForce GTX 775M outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 by 110% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 +117%	23 −117%
1440p	8−9 +100%	4 −100%
4K	30−35 +100%	15 −100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+100%

7−8

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +113%	14−16 −113%
Hitman 3	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +63.2%	19 −63.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +136%	10−12 −136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +44.4%	18 −44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +75%	16 −75%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +400%	5 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +113%	14−16 −113%
Hitman 3	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +107%	15 −107%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +170%	10 −170%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +136%	10−12 −136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +225%	8 −225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +72.7%	11 −72.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +100%	14−16 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +113%	14−16 −113%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +210%	10 −210%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +200%	9 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +217%	6 −217%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+136%

10−12

−136%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Metro Exodus	12−14	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%