Radeon 760M vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Place in the ranking	386	356
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.12	68.01
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	no data	Hawx Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	512
Core clock speed	811 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2599 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	83.17
Floating-point processing power	no data	5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	System Shared
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 13.33

Radeon 760M 14.82
+11.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569

Radeon 760M 9603
+0.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 −14.8%	31 +14.8%
1440p	16−18 −18.8%	19 +18.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −4.2%	25 +4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −15.4%	30 +15.4%
Elden Ring	40−45 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −11.6%	45−50 +11.6%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +26.3%	19 −26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +117%	12 −117%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +5.9%	51 −5.9%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −13.9%	40−45 +13.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%
Valorant	50−55 −11.3%	55−60 +11.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −11.6%	45−50 +11.6%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +33.3%	18 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +189%	9 −189%
Dota 2	45−50 +109%	23 −109%
Elden Ring	40−45 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +75.9%	29 −75.9%
Fortnite	75−80 −9.2%	80−85 +9.2%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +22.7%	44 −22.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +41.2%	34 −41.2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −13.9%	40−45 +13.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −9.2%	100−110 +9.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%
Valorant	50−55 −11.3%	55−60 +11.3%
World of Tanks	170−180 −7.3%	190−200 +7.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −11.6%	45−50 +11.6%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%
Dota 2	45−50 −10.4%	50−55 +10.4%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −7.8%	55−60 +7.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +45.9%	37 −45.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −9.2%	100−110 +9.2%
Valorant	50−55 −11.3%	55−60 +11.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Elden Ring	20−22 −15%	21−24 +15%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−105 −31%	130−140 +31%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
World of Tanks	90−95 −10.6%	100−110 +10.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −16.1%	35−40 +16.1%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −12.5%	35−40 +12.5%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −14.3%	30−35 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Valorant	30−35 −12.1%	35−40 +12.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Dota 2	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Elden Ring	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −12.8%	40−45 +12.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Dota 2	24−27 −8.3%	24−27 +8.3%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Fortnite	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −16.7%	21−24 +16.7%
Valorant	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

Radeon 760M is 15% faster in 1080p
Radeon 760M is 19% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 189% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 760M is 33% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 770M SLI is ahead in 10 tests (16%)
Radeon 760M is ahead in 52 tests (83%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.33	14.82
Recency	30 May 2013	6 December 2023
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 11.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.