GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs GTX 770M SLI

Place in the ranking	394	432
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.88	5.66
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1536
Core clock speed	811 MHz	850 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	130 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
SLI options	+	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	2x 2 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	4000 MHz
Shared memory	-	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	11
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 12.79
+19.8%

GTX 765M SLI 10.68

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569
+20.5%

GTX 765M SLI 7944

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

80−85
+15.9%

−15.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Elden Ring	35−40 +21.9%	30−35 −21.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +20%	35−40 −20%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +18.6%	40−45 −18.6%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +14.3%	27−30 −14.3%
Valorant	50−55 +21.4%	40−45 −21.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +20%	35−40 −20%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Dota 2	45−50 +17.9%	35−40 −17.9%
Elden Ring	35−40 +21.9%	30−35 −21.9%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +14%	40−45 −14%
Fortnite	70−75 +17.7%	60−65 −17.7%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +18.6%	40−45 −18.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +21.1%	35−40 −21.1%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +15.9%	80−85 −15.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +14.3%	27−30 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +21.9%	30−35 −21.9%
Valorant	50−55 +21.4%	40−45 −21.4%
World of Tanks	170−180 −13.9%	197 +13.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +20%	35−40 −20%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Dota 2	45−50 +17.9%	35−40 −17.9%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +14%	40−45 −14%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +18.6%	40−45 −18.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +15.9%	80−85 −15.9%
Valorant	50−55 +21.4%	40−45 −21.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Elden Ring	18−20 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +74%	50−55 −74%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
World of Tanks	90−95 +18.4%	75−80 −18.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +20.8%	24−27 −20.8%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Valorant	30−35 +23.1%	24−27 −23.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Dota 2	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Elden Ring	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +19.4%	30−35 −19.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Dota 2	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
Fortnite	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Valorant	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and GTX 765M SLI compete in popular games:

GTX 770M SLI is 16% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 74% faster.
in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 765M SLI is 14% faster.

All in all, in popular games: