560 Ti vs 770M SLI

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 770M SLI
14.35
+82.8%

770M SLI outperforms 560 Ti by 83% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking333482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money20.761.75
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF114
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (10 years old)25 January 2011 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249
Current price$149 $130 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770M SLI has 1086% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920384
Core clock speed811 MHz822 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.67
Floating-point performanceno data1,263.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 770M SLI and GeForce GTX 560 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz2004 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.3 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 14.35
+82.8%
GTX 560 Ti 7.85

770M SLI outperforms 560 Ti by 83% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 770M SLI 9569
+138%
GTX 560 Ti 4013

770M SLI outperforms 560 Ti by 138% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p110−120
+74.6%
63
−74.6%
Full HD110−120
+69.2%
65
−69.2%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+68.2%
21−24
−68.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
Hitman 3 35−40
+105%
18−20
−105%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+68.2%
21−24
−68.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
Hitman 3 35−40
+105%
18−20
−105%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+118%
10−12
−118%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+94.7%
18−20
−94.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+95%
20−22
−95%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Hitman 3 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+136%
10−12
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Hitman 3 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and GTX 560 Ti compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 770M SLI is 74.6% faster than GTX 560 Ti

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 770M SLI is 69.2% faster than GTX 560 Ti

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 267% faster than the GTX 560 Ti.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 770M SLI surpassed GTX 560 Ti in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 14.35 7.85
Recency 30 May 2013 25 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 170 Watt

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 731 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.