NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs MX230
Comparison of GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230 architecture, market type and release date.
GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Standard memory configuration
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230.
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support
Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Blu-Ray 3D Support
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
APIs supported by GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
GTX 765M 4.72
GeForce MX230 5.19 +10%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GTX 765M 17616 +11.5%
GeForce MX230 15797
3DMark Fire Strike Score
GTX 765M 2362 +2.7%
GeForce MX230 2299
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
GTX 765M 2479 +0.4%
GeForce MX230 2468
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
GTX 765M 4019 +19.5%
GeForce MX230 3364
GTX 765M 1949
GeForce MX230 2009 +3.1%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)
More pipelines (768 vs 256)
Higher memory bandwidth (64 vs 48.06 GB/s)
SLI (Scalable Link Interface - a technology for uniting several NVIDIA GPUs processing power in one PC)
OpenCL (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
3D Vision Surround
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX230
10% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (21 February 2019 vs 30 May 2013)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 75 watts)
GeForce Experience (software suite built to manage NVIDIA GPU parameters, and to record and stream game video)
So, GTX 765M or MX230?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M and NVIDIA GeForce MX230. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.