NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs MX130
Comparison of GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130 architecture, market type and release date.
GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
55.23 GTexel / s
29.81 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
GDDR5 / DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
Standard memory configuration
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
64.0 GB / s
40.1 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130.
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support
Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Blu-Ray 3D Support
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
APIs supported by GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
GTX 765M 5.62 +13.3%
GeForce MX130 4.96
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GTX 765M 17616 +29.4%
GeForce MX130 13610
3DMark Fire Strike Score
GTX 765M 2362 +7.2%
GeForce MX130 2203
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
GTX 765M 2479 +5.7%
GeForce MX130 2345
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
GTX 765M 4019 +39.8%
GeForce MX130 2875
3DMark Vantage Performance
GTX 765M 14870 +24.2%
GeForce MX130 11968
Unigine Heaven 3.0
GTX 765M 36 +28.6%
GeForce MX130 28
GTX 765M 2137 +9.4%
GeForce MX130 1953
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
13.3% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)
More pipelines (768 vs 384)
Higher memory bandwidth (64 vs 40.1 GB/s)
SLI (Scalable Link Interface - a technology for uniting several NVIDIA GPUs processing power in one PC)
OpenCL (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
3D Vision Surround
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX130
Much newer (1 January 2018 vs 30 May 2013)
Less power hungry (30 vs 60 watts)
GeForce Experience (software suite built to manage NVIDIA GPU parameters, and to record and stream game video)
So, GTX 765M or MX130?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.