GeForce MX130 vs GTX 765M

Place in the ranking	621	647
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.79	10.92
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	GK106	GM108
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	17 November 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1122 MHz
Boost clock speed	863 MHz	1242 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.23	29.81
Floating-point processing power	1.326 TFLOPS	0.9539 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	64	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB/s	40.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP content protection	+	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M 5.21
+9.7%

GeForce MX130 4.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 765M 2004
+9.6%

GeForce MX130 1828

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 765M 4019
+39.8%

GeForce MX130 2875

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 765M 14870
+24.2%

GeForce MX130 11968

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 765M 2479
+5.7%

GeForce MX130 2345

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 765M 17616
+29.4%

GeForce MX130 13610

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 765M 7240
+10.8%

GeForce MX130 6532

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

GTX 765M 6714
+32.9%

GeForce MX130 5051

GeekBench 5 CUDA

GTX 765M 5514

GeForce MX130 6872
+24.6%

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 765M 36
+28.3%

GeForce MX130 28

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	51 +13.3%	45−50 −13.3%
Full HD	39 +129%	17 −129%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4 −150%
Elden Ring	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	22 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Valorant	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +333%	3 −333%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 −23.5%	21 +23.5%
Elden Ring	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −4%	26 +4%
Fortnite	30−35 +29.2%	24 −29.2%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +13.3%	15 −13.3%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +25.7%	35 −25.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18 +28.6%	14 −28.6%
Valorant	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
World of Tanks	107 +37.2%	75−80 −37.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 −64.7%	28 +64.7%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +8.7%	21−24 −8.7%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +57.1%	14 −57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +340%	10 −340%
Valorant	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Elden Ring	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +6.3%	30−35 −6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
World of Tanks	35−40 +8.8%	30−35 −8.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Fortnite	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Valorant	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

This is how GTX 765M and GeForce MX130 compete in popular games:

GTX 765M is 13% faster in 900p
GTX 765M is 129% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 765M is 340% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX130 is 65% faster.

All in all, in popular games: