GeForce MX570 vs GTX 765M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 760A GTX 760M GTX 765M GTX 765M SLI
VS
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 765M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
4.50

MX570 outperforms GTX 765M by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 765M GTX 765M
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking637368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.7541.16
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK106GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed850 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed863 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate55.2373.92
Floating-point processing power1.326 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs6464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus++
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 765M 4.50
GeForce MX570 13.00
+189%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 765M 2009
GeForce MX570 5810
+189%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p51
−175%
140−150
+175%
Full HD40
+2.6%
39
−2.6%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−481%
122
+481%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−189%
24−27
+189%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−205%
60−65
+205%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−405%
106
+405%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−236%
45−50
+236%
Fortnite 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−168%
55−60
+168%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−189%
24−27
+189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−174%
50−55
+174%
Valorant 60−65
−96.7%
110−120
+96.7%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−205%
60−65
+205%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−90.5%
40
+90.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 107
−79.4%
190−200
+79.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Dota 2 40−45
−120%
90−95
+120%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−236%
45−50
+236%
Fortnite 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−168%
55−60
+168%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−218%
54
+218%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−189%
24−27
+189%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−174%
50−55
+174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Valorant 60−65
−96.7%
110−120
+96.7%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−205%
60−65
+205%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−190%
27−30
+190%
Dota 2 40−45
−120%
90−95
+120%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−236%
45−50
+236%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−168%
55−60
+168%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−189%
24−27
+189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−174%
50−55
+174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−143%
34
+143%
Valorant 60−65
−96.7%
110−120
+96.7%
Fortnite 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−184%
100−110
+184%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−291%
130−140
+291%
Valorant 50−55
−170%
140−150
+170%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Fortnite 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Valorant 24−27
−221%
75−80
+221%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 16−18
−200%
50−55
+200%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−257%
24−27
+257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Fortnite 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GTX 765M and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 175% faster in 900p
  • GTX 765M is 3% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 61 test (92%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.50 13.00
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 188.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 765M GeForce GTX 765M
vs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 Iris Pro Graphics P580
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
RX 5500M Radeon RX 5500M
GTX 765M GeForce GTX 765M
vs
R9 M385X Radeon R9 M385X
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
vs
GT 230M GeForce GT 230M
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GTX 970M GeForce GTX 970M
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU M3 Max 30-Core GPU
GTX 960M GeForce GTX 960M
vs
UHD Graphics 32EU UHD Graphics 32EU
GTX 770M GeForce GTX 770M
vs
HD Graphics 5500 HD Graphics 5500
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
vs
GTX 580M GeForce GTX 580M
W5130M FirePro W5130M
vs
GTX 850A GeForce GTX 850A
R9 M265X Radeon R9 M265X
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
Arc A550M Arc A550M
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
vs
UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7
77 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
106 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 765M or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.