MX110 vs GTX 760M

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking619663
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.650.95
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN14E-GLN16V-GMR1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (10 years old)1 January 2018 (6 years old)
Current price$163 $1057
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760M has 74% better value for money than GeForce MX110.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768256
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed657 MHz965 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz993 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate42.0523.83
Floating-point performance1,009 gflops762.6 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce MX110 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus++
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760M
4.43
+18.4%

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 18% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760M 1717
+18.6%
GeForce MX110 1448

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 19% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760M 14007
+53.5%
GeForce MX110 9124

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 54% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760M 3369
+58.8%
GeForce MX110 2121

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 59% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760M 2271
+32.5%
GeForce MX110 1714

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 32% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760M 15900
+41.1%
GeForce MX110 11266

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 41% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 760M 5691
+35.7%
GeForce MX110 4193

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 36% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 760M 4868
+44.3%
GeForce MX110 3374

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 44% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 760M 4287
GeForce MX110 4625
+7.9%

MX110 outperforms GTX 760M by 8% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 760M 33
+50.2%
GeForce MX110 22

GTX 760M outperforms MX110 by 50% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p39
+30%
30−35
−30%
Full HD44
+144%
18
−144%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−12.5%
9
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
−7.7%
14
+7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+50%
10
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−11.1%
10
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−6.7%
16
+6.7%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+37.5%
8
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+25%
12
−25%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+200%
2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how GTX 760M and GeForce MX110 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 760M is 30% faster than GeForce MX110

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 760M is 144% faster than GeForce MX110

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 760M is 200% faster than the GeForce MX110.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX110 is 12.5% faster than the GTX 760M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 760M is ahead in 39 tests (72%)
  • GeForce MX110 is ahead in 5 tests (9%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (19%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.43 3.74
Recency 30 May 2013 1 January 2018
Memory bus width 128 64
Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 256
Memory bandwidth 64 40.1
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 30 Watt

The GeForce GTX 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX110 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GTX 760M
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 95 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 2025 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.