GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs GTX 760

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 760
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.48

RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms GTX 760 by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking401166
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.5469.22
Power efficiency5.0717.41
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK104GA106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 8 GB has 1425% better value for money than GTX 760.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11522560
Core clock speed980 MHz1552 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt130 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate99.07142.2
Floating-point processing power2.378 TFLOPS9.098 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs9680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mm242 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Minimum recommended system power500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.48
RTX 3050 8 GB 32.80
+163%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760 4797
RTX 3050 8 GB 12612
+163%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
−150%
170−180
+150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.66
−150%
1.46
+150%
  • RTX 3050 8 GB has 150% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Elden Ring 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−160%
130−140
+160%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Valorant 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Dota 2 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Elden Ring 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−150%
120−130
+150%
Fortnite 70−75
−154%
180−190
+154%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−160%
130−140
+160%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−158%
240−250
+158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−150%
95−100
+150%
Valorant 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
World of Tanks 170−180
−135%
400−450
+135%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Dota 2 45−50
−144%
110−120
+144%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−150%
120−130
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−160%
130−140
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−158%
240−250
+158%
Valorant 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Elden Ring 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−163%
210−220
+163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
World of Tanks 85−90
−161%
230−240
+161%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−159%
75−80
+159%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−159%
75−80
+159%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Valorant 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Dota 2 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Elden Ring 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 21−24
−161%
60−65
+161%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Fortnite 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Valorant 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%

This is how GTX 760 and RTX 3050 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 8 GB is 150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.48 32.80
Recency 25 June 2013 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 130 Watt

RTX 3050 8 GB has a 162.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2140 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13204 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.