GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs 750 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

GTX 750 Ti
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
10.11

1050 3GB Mobile outperforms 750 Ti by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking411365
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.11no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM107no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$357 (2.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1020 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Wattno data
Texture fill rate43.40no data
Floating-point performance1,389 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length5.7" (14.5 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC supportno data+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data
Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.11
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.81
+26.7%

1050 3GB Mobile outperforms 750 Ti by 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 4294
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401
+49.1%

1050 3GB Mobile outperforms 750 Ti by 49% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Hitman 3 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 22% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.11 12.81
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 5997 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 93 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.