690 vs 770

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 393$
Games supported 80%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 915
  • Max video memory 4096 MB (2048 MB per GPU) GDDR5
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 6008 MHz
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 167$
Games supported 82%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating249240
Value for money6.7817.55
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK104GK104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 May 2012 (10 years ago)30 May 2013 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $399
Price now$393 (0.4x MSRP)$167 (0.4x MSRP)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
CUDA cores30721536
Core clock speed915 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1019 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)300 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperatureno data98 °C
Texture fill rate234 billion/sec134 billion/sec
Floating-point performance2x 3,130 gflops3,333 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length11.0" (27.9 cm)10.5" (26.7 cm)
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system powerno data600 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5no data
Memory bus width512-bit (256-bit per GPU)256 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s224.3 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displays4 displays
HDMIYes (via dongle)no data
HDCP++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
Blu Ray 3Dno data+
3D Gaming++
3D Visionno data+
PhysXno data+
3D Vision Live++

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.3
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 690 18.89
GTX 770 19.81
+4.9%
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • Passmark
  • GeekBench 5 CUDA
  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 690 13160
+61.5%
GTX 770 8150

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 690 5619
GTX 770 5894
+4.9%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 690 12263
GTX 770 13785
+12.4%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 690 10541
GTX 770 14232
+35%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 690 14979
GTX 770 16627
+11%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 690 and GeForce GTX 770. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 156 Mh/s 113 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 3.9 Mh/s

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 18.89 19.81
Novelty 3 May 2012 30 May 2013
Cost $999 $399
Memory bus width 512 256
Memory bandwidth 384 224.3

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

and

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of GeForce GTX 690 by AMD

The nearest GeForce GTX 690's AMD equivalent is Radeon R9 280, which is faster by 1% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon R9 280 Radeon R9 280
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 690:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 100

Competitors of GeForce GTX 770 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 770 from AMD is Radeon R9 280X, which is slower by 1% and lower by 3 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon R9 280X Radeon R9 280X
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 770:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 110 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 642 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.