Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs GTX 690
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 690 with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.
690 outperforms Nvidia 1050 3GB Mobile by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 356 | 390 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.49 | no data |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | GK104 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 3 May 2012 (12 years ago) | April 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 768 |
CUDA cores | 3072 | no data |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1366 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1019 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,540 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 130.4 | no data |
Floating-point performance | 3.13 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 279 mm | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | 3 MB |
Memory bus width | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) | 96 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 84 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2 | no data |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
HDMI | Yes (via dongle) | - |
HDCP | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
G-SYNC support | - | + |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Blu-Ray | + | - |
3D Gaming | + | - |
3D Vision Live | + | - |
Multi-Projection | no data | + |
Multi Monitor | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | no data |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.2 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 14.44 | 12.83 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | 3 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
GTX 690 has a 12.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 136433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 690 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 690 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.