Radeon HD 7770 vs GeForce GTX 680MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680MX with Radeon HD 7770, including specs and performance data.

GTX 680MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
10.73
+90.9%

GTX 680MX outperforms HD 7770 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking396569
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.020.39
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameno dataCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)15 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129.99
Current price$200 $300 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 680MX has 2213% better value for money than HD 7770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed720 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec40.00

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon HD 7770 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinityno data+
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680MX 10.73
+90.9%
HD 7770 5.62

GeForce GTX 680MX outperforms Radeon HD 7770 by 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 680MX 4142
+90.9%
HD 7770 2170

GeForce GTX 680MX outperforms Radeon HD 7770 by 91% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 680MX 6736
+117%
HD 7770 3098

GeForce GTX 680MX outperforms Radeon HD 7770 by 117% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 680MX 25501
+81.2%
HD 7770 14073

GeForce GTX 680MX outperforms Radeon HD 7770 by 81% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p85−90
+80.9%
47
−80.9%
Full HD52
+2%
51
−2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

This is how GTX 680MX and HD 7770 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680MX is 81% faster in 900p
  • GTX 680MX is 2% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.73 5.62
Recency 23 October 2012 15 February 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 80 Watt

The GeForce GTX 680MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7770 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680MX is a notebook card while Radeon HD 7770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
AMD Radeon HD 7770
Radeon HD 7770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 905 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.