Radeon R7 350 640SP vs GeForce GTX 680MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking525not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.73no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameno dataCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 October 2012 (13 years ago)7 January 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
Core clock speed720 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec37.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.184 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 7 January 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 55 Watt

R7 350 640SP has an age advantage of 6 years, and 122% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680MX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 350 640SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680MX or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.