GeForce MX450 vs GTX 680MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce MX450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 680MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
10.73
+11%

GTX 680MX outperforms GeForce MX450 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking396428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.01no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameno dataN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)1 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$200 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536896
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed720 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec100.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce MX450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+no data
Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkanno data1.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680MX 10.73
+11%
GeForce MX450 9.67

GTX 680MX outperforms MX450 by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 680MX 4142
+11%
GeForce MX450 3733

GTX 680MX outperforms MX450 by 11% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 680MX 6736
GeForce MX450 8250
+22.5%

MX450 outperforms GTX 680MX by 22% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 680MX 25501
+11.7%
GeForce MX450 22831

GTX 680MX outperforms MX450 by 12% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 680MX 12198
GeForce MX450 28961
+137%

MX450 outperforms GTX 680MX by 137% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 680MX 11307
GeForce MX450 29969
+165%

MX450 outperforms GTX 680MX by 165% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
+79.3%
29
−79.3%
1440p18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%
4K24−27
+0%
24
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

This is how GTX 680MX and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680MX is 79% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 680MX is 6% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.73 9.67
Recency 23 October 2012 1 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 25 Watt

The GeForce GTX 680MX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1238 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.