GeForce MX450 vs GTX 670M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670M and GeForce MX450, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 670M
2012
1536 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
4.56

MX450 outperforms GTX 670M by a whopping 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking657460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.1726.59
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF114N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336896
Core clock speed598 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate33.49100.8
Floating-point processing power0.8037 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs5664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB2 GB
Memory bus width192bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72.0 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670M 4.56
GeForce MX450 9.70
+113%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670M 1756
GeForce MX450 3735
+113%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670M 2698
GeForce MX450 8250
+206%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 670M 12670
GeForce MX450 22831
+80.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 670M 1950
GeForce MX450 4725
+142%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 670M 14940
GeForce MX450 27570
+84.5%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 670M 6448
GeForce MX450 29016
+350%

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 670M 28
GeForce MX450 57
+107%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p39
−105%
80−85
+105%
Full HD40
+37.9%
29
−37.9%
1440p8−9
−125%
18
+125%
4K14−16
−114%
30
+114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−300%
32
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−175%
22
+175%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−129%
60−65
+129%
Hitman 3 10−11
−200%
30
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−76.7%
50−55
+76.7%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−450%
55
+450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−275%
45
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−88.2%
30−35
+88.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−109%
94
+109%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−50%
6
+50%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−62.5%
13
+62.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−108%
27−30
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−129%
60−65
+129%
Hitman 3 10−11
−190%
29
+190%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−76.7%
50−55
+76.7%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−270%
37
+270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−135%
40
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−97.8%
89
+97.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−175%
11
+175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−129%
60−65
+129%
Hitman 3 10−11
−150%
25
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+25%
24
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−76.5%
30
+76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−17.6%
20
+17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+543%
7
−543%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−158%
31
+158%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−425%
40−45
+425%
Hitman 3 9−10
−100%
18
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−100%
20−22
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−118%
60−65
+118%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−225%
26
+225%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Hitman 3 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 7−8

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
+0%
7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
+0%
18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GTX 670M and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX450 is 105% faster in 900p
  • GTX 670M is 38% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX450 is 125% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX450 is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 670M is 543% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 670M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • GeForce MX450 is ahead in 64 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.56 9.70
Recency 22 March 2012 1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX450 has a 112.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX450 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GeForce GTX 670M
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 92 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1322 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.