ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GTX 680M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5661596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.47no data
Power efficiency6.02no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK104RS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2012 (13 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$310.50 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13442
Core clock speed719 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHz180 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate84.900.37
Floating-point processing power2.038 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1122
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 680M 3276
+163700%
Samples: 481
ATI IGP 340M 2
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p67no data
Full HD64no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.85no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Valorant 80−85
+257%
21−24
−257%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 128
+1322%
9−10
−1322%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 60−65
+757%
7−8
−757%
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Valorant 80−85
+257%
21−24
−257%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 60−65
+757%
7−8
−757%
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Valorant 80−85
+257%
21−24
−257%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 85−90 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 40−45 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 680M is 1650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 680M surpassed ATI IGP 340M in all 23 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2012 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GTX 680M has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GeForce GTX 680M
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 67 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680M or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.