ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GTX 670MX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	691	1605
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.86	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	GK104	RS200
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2012 (13 years ago)	5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	960	2
Core clock speed	600 MHz	183 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	180 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	48.08	0.37
Floating-point processing power	1.154 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	24	2
TMUs	80	2
L1 Cache	80 KB	no data
L2 Cache	384 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	67.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

+

-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	7.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.4
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

40

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 October 2012	5 October 2002
Chip lithography	28 nm	180 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---