Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs GeForce GTX 680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680 and Radeon RX 6750 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 680
2012
2048 MB GDDR5, 195 Watt
13.26

RX 6750 GRE outperforms GTX 680 by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 680 GTX 680
RX 6750 GRE RX 6750 GRE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.8145.23
Power efficiency5.0712.78
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (13 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6750 GRE has 1510% better value for money than GTX 680.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362560
Core clock speed1006 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1058 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)195 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate135.4413.0
Floating-point processing power3.25 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3264
TMUs128160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length254 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2048 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256-bit GDDR5192 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 680 13.26
RX 6750 GRE 42.83
+223%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 680 5590
RX 6750 GRE 18051
+223%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45
−211%
140−150
+211%
Full HD75
−220%
240−250
+220%
4K25
−220%
80−85
+220%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.65
−191%
2.29
+191%
4K19.96
−191%
6.86
+191%
  • RX 6750 GRE has 191% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE has 191% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−216%
240−250
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−222%
190−200
+222%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−216%
240−250
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%
Fortnite 75−80
−221%
250−260
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−216%
180−190
+216%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−220%
160−170
+220%
Valorant 110−120
−204%
350−400
+204%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−222%
190−200
+222%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−216%
240−250
+216%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 224
−213%
700−750
+213%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Dota 2 85−90
−218%
280−290
+218%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%
Fortnite 75−80
−221%
250−260
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−216%
180−190
+216%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−202%
130−140
+202%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
−221%
180−190
+221%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−220%
160−170
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
−210%
130−140
+210%
Valorant 110−120
−204%
350−400
+204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−222%
190−200
+222%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−221%
90−95
+221%
Dota 2 85−90
−218%
280−290
+218%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−216%
180−190
+216%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−220%
80−85
+220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−220%
160−170
+220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−218%
70−75
+218%
Valorant 110−120
−204%
350−400
+204%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−221%
250−260
+221%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−197%
300−310
+197%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−192%
350−400
+192%
Valorant 140−150
−215%
450−500
+215%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−216%
120−130
+216%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−217%
95−100
+217%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−203%
100−105
+203%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
−217%
95−100
+217%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 21
−210%
65−70
+210%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−213%
50−55
+213%
Valorant 70−75
−211%
230−240
+211%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−216%
60−65
+216%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Dota 2 45−50
−206%
150−160
+206%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−213%
75−80
+213%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%

This is how GTX 680 and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE is 211% faster in 900p
  • RX 6750 GRE is 220% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE is 220% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.26 42.83
Recency 22 March 2012 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2048 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 195 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 680 has 28.2% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 223% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 680 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 680 GeForce GTX 680
vs
HD 7990 Radeon HD 7990
RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE
vs
RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900
GTX 680 GeForce GTX 680
vs
R9 280 Radeon R9 280
GTX 650 Ti OEM GTX 650 Ti OEM
vs
GTX 680 GTX 680
8600 GTS GeForce 8600 GTS
vs
GTX 680 GeForce GTX 680
Instinct MI50 Radeon Instinct MI50
vs
GTX 680 GeForce GTX 680
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
vs
GTX 680 GTX 680
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
vs
GTX 680 GeForce GTX 680
M3000M Quadro M3000M
vs
HD 7970 Radeon HD 7970
K2100M Quadro K2100M
vs
HD 7970 Radeon HD 7970
GT 640M GeForce GT 640M
vs
HD 7970 Radeon HD 7970
HD 6790 Radeon HD 6790
vs
HD 7970 Radeon HD 7970
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
HD 7970 Radeon HD 7970

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 608 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 245 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680 or Radeon RX 6750 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.