FireGL V3400 vs GeForce GTX 680

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking339not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.11no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGK104RV530
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2005 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data
Current price$156 (0.3x MSRP)$175

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1006 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1058 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)195 Wattno data
Texture fill rate128.8 billion/sec2.000
Floating-point performance3,090.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length10.0" (25.4 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2048 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.22.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 2048 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680 and FireGL V3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680 is a desktop card while FireGL V3400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680
ATI FireGL V3400
FireGL V3400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 558 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate FireGL V3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.