GeForce Go 6100 vs GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI and GeForce Go 6100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
7.47
+18575%

GTX 675M SLI outperforms Go 6100 by a whopping 18575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5141498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.96no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2C51MV
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)1 February 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683
Core clock speed620 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speedno data425 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5shared Memory
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11shared Memory
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Valorant 80−85
+242%
24−27
−242%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+1311%
9−10
−1311%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Valorant 80−85
+242%
24−27
−242%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Dota 2 60−65
+663%
8−9
−663%
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Valorant 80−85
+242%
24−27
−242%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 0−1
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
Valorant 90−95 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 40−45
+4100%
1−2
−4100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 27−30 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 675M SLI surpassed Go 6100 in all 22 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.47 0.04
Recency 6 January 2011 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm

GTX 675M SLI has a 18575% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6100 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100
GeForce Go 6100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 19 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675M SLI or GeForce Go 6100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.